About Me & This Website
My Positions
On Facebook
Contact Me

  Pro-Caucus Chairman
  Free the Delegates
  Social Security Unsoundness
  Clinton Surplus Myth
  Taxes, Rich & Poor
  Clinton Surplus Myth, Pt. 2
  Financial Crisis
  Obama's Economy
  More articles...

  Live: U.S. Senate
  Live: U.S. House
  America's Marines

Some Humor
  Time for Campaignin'

The Coming U.S. Bond Crisis   April 7th, 2011
It's all about a fiscally responsible budget for FY2012       


More observations...

Now that 2010 is over, everyone's starting to think about 2012. But before we talk about the 2012 presidential election, we need to focus on FY2012. The 2012 budget. That fight is already underway, it will be resolved by October of this year, and it's the fight we should be focusing on for now.

Don't get me wrong. Taking back the White House is extremely important. But the biggest danger to our country right now is out-of-control deficit spending, and we can (and must) address that now. We can't wait. And while the importance of electing a good president cannot be understated, getting our spending under control is even more important.

Regardless of whether or not the next president is Republican or Democrat, it's absolutely critical that we get our spending and budget deficit under control. There will be serious consequences if we keep trying to borrow and spend this much money with such large deficits. And if we don't address our deficits this year it's even less likely we'll do it in a presidential election year which means we'll put it off until 2013. I don't think we can get away with ignoring the problem that long.

The potential consequences of failing to resolve our deficit include high inflation, high unemployment, high interest rates, lower home values, loss of value of the dollar, loss of the status of the dollar as a reserve currency, a bond crisis that would effectively shut down the government overnight, and an economic collapse--not just of the United States, but of the world.

All of these are very real possibilities. They're not exaggerations. The only questions are which of these possibilities will occur, in what order, and when.

To emphasize, the latter question is when, not if.

It's probable that we can't avoid these consequences entirely. Decades of reckless deficit spending--and astronomical deficit spending for the last few years--guarantee that we're going to experience most of the these consequences to some degree regardless of what we do now. But we can lessen their severity by getting our deficit spending under control. And we can still avoid a bond crisis--and a bond crisis would be the kind of seismic economic event that could have devestating effects on the economy.

The Bond Crisis

A bond crisis will occur when the federal government wants to borrow money from the public (from citizens, investment firms, or foreign governments), and no-one wants to loan the government money... or, more likely, will only loan money at an extremely high interest rate.

The most likely scenario is that there will always be someone that's willing to loan money to the United States--the question just becomes at what interest rate? In a bond crisis the government issuing the bonds has to offer a much higher interest rate due to the perceived risk of the country not paying the money back. In order to entice investors to loan money to the government, a much higher interest rate is paid.

The problem is that the United States, with a $14 trillion national debt, cannot afford to pay a higher rate of interest. Obama's budget proposal outlines interest rates of 3.2% this year going up to 5.3% in 2021, and that produces interest payments of $205 billion this year to $928 billion in 2021. And the projected annual deficit is going from $841 billion in 2015 to $1,116 billion in 2021. That means in 2021, 83% of the money we borrow will be to pay interest on money we've already borrowed.

So if instead of 5.3% interest in 2021 we're paying 15.8% (like we did right after Carter), our interest will be $2.7 trillion per year, and our annual deficit will be almost $3 trillion... almost all on interest! Using Obama's own estimates, the GDP in 2021 will be $24 trillion per year. So we'd be paying 11% of our GDP on interest.

Considering that economists generally consider a 3% deficit "sustainable," the fact that we'd have an 11% deficit just to pay for interest indicates just how ridiculous the proposition is.

Obama's budget proposal (the Democrats' spending plan) is dangerous because it assumes we can keep borrowing trillions of dollars per year without consequences. And it's based on extremely optimistic improvements in unemployment, extremely favorable interest rates for the next decade, and absurdly strong growth (4-6% growth each year for the next decade, with no slowdowns). If any of those assumptions are wrong, Obama's proposal is nothing short of a catastrophe.

When Will It Happen?

The $14 trillion question is when the United States will face a bond crisis. When will our debt be so high that no-one will believe we can pay it back? When will our deficit be so large that there will simply not be enough money in the world to loan us enough each year? (actually, that already happened which is why the Federal Reserve is printing money, but I digress).

There are those that think this is a theoretical problem... that it will either never happen to us, or it won't happen for a long, long time. In other words, they think we still have time to ignore the problem so we don't have to make the hard decisions right now.

But when a bond crisis happens, it can happen very quickly--without warning.

As shown in the graphs to the right, Greece went from fairly normal interest rates in October 2009 to bond crisis and bailout in May 2010--just seven months. Ireland went from normal interest rates in June 2010 to crisis and bailout in November the same year--just five months.

Once the crisis begins to unfold, it's very unlikely that large enough measures can be taken quickly enough to stop the crisis from playing out. Looking at the Portugal graph to the right, when Greece confronted its bond crisis in May 2010 Portugal immediately took notice and realized it had to reduce its deficit or it would suffer the same fate as Greece. And while public pronouncements of its intent to do so did temporarily reassure markets and drive its interest rates down, they've been going up faster and faster ever since. In April 2011--eleven months after they realized they had a problem and tried to take action to fix the problem--they still requested a bailout.

The common theme is that a bond crisis goes from "yeah, we know we have a problem we need to fix in the future" to "we have a problem we should have fixed yesterday" very quickly. And once it's clear there's a problem, it's generally too late to avoid the final bond crisis.

Consequences of a U.S. Bond Crisis

In the case of Greece, Ireland, and Portugal, the European Union was available to bail them out. Even then, interest rates continued to increase for both Greece and Ireland after the initial bailout--so even those bailouts have been little more than stopgap measures, not real solutions.

But in the case of the United States there will be no-one to bail us out.

Greece is a $329 billion economy. Ireland is a $229 billion economy. Portugal a $233 billion economy. The United States, on the other hand, is a $14.1 trillion economy. If Greece, Ireland, and Portugal--with a combined economy of $791 billion--are causing this much grief for Europe and the world, can you imagine the fallout of a bond crisis in a $14 trillion economy?

Some of the consequences of a U.S. bond crisis could be:

  • Mass layoffs. The U.S. Government would have to abruptly layoff a large number of government workers. While reducing the size of government is certainly a good idea, it should be done in an orderly manner. Laying off hundreds of thousands of workers overnight would be a massive unemployment shock. With more people unemployed, fewer people could afford their homes and there would be more foreclosures.

  • Inflation. Inflation has already made its way into the economy. But a bond crisis would all but demand that the Federal Reserve engage in a massive QE3 (or QE4, etc). That is, the Federal Reserve would start printing huge amounts of money which would cause further inflation in everything we buy. With the prices of food, clothing and gasoline going up, fewer people could afford their homes and there would be more foreclosures.

  • High interest rates. When the government pays high interest rates, so does everyone else. If the government is paying 15% interest rate, consumers are going to be paying more than that for car loans, student loans, and for mortgages. Such high interest rates would reduce economic activity since people would be in a worse position to afford cars, education, and homes. Those homeowners that still have adjustable rate mortgages would also be faced with their interest rate resetting to stratospheric levels they almost certainly could not afford--this would lead to more foreclosures.

  • Drop in home prices. Due to the fact that there would be more homes on the market due to foreclosures (see above) and since fewer people would be able to afford to buy a home due to high interest rates, there would be even more supply and even less demand than there is now. Home prices would drop even further leading to more strategic defaults which would result in (you guessed it) more foreclosures.

  • Slowing economy. With fewer people having jobs, and people in general having less money to buy more expensive products at higher interest rates, economic activity would slow further. This would lead companies to reduce employment which would lead to more unemployment--at that point we go back to the first bullet point of this section, but now the layoffs are in the private sector... and the cycle repeats itself.
The consequences of a U.S. bond crisis are not theoretical, and everyone in the country could be severely impacted.

Focus on FY2012

It is in the context of these huge threats to our economy that the matter of cutting spending takes on such importance. Republicans are not insisting on budget cuts just for fun, or to pick a needless fight with Democrats. Getting our fiscal house in order is something our country can't put off any longer.

The prize is the FY2012 budget. If Republicans can get a plan like Paul Ryan's adopted, that'll be a major change in our fiscal course. It's not a complete solution since it still contemplates large deficits for years to come. But it's a significant enough change that I'm very optimistic that it would put the bond markets at ease long enough for us to truly shore up our finances over the next few years. It buys us time.

On the other hand, if Democrats not only reject this proposal but refuse to come up with a credible plan for deficit reduction themselves, I fear that the moment of reckoning of a bond crisis will be even sooner. To date, everyone (even Democrats) say they agree that we have to get our fiscal house in order eventually, and the bond market has taken those words at face value. But "eventually" is now. If Republicans try to make meaningful reductions in our deficit and Democrats absolutely refuse, the bond markets could easily conclude that our politicians will never be able to address the issue--and that could provoke the very crisis we're trying to avoid.

Even as Republicans are fighting Democrats for some minimal concessions toward fiscal responsibility, Portugal has succumbed and is asking for a bailout. First it was Greece, then Ireland, and now Portugal. The dominoes falling in Europe should be a stark reminder to politicians in the United States of where we're heading if we continue on our current course.

The stakes could not be higher. The FY2012 budget is our primary battle and it will be won or lost in the next six months. And if we lose the battle for the FY2012 budget, the presidential election might be of very little importance.

If a bond crisis happens before the 2012 election, the damage to our country will already be done.

 Go to the article list