Craig Steiner, u.s. Common Sense American Conservatism |
About Me & This Website My Positions On Facebook Contact Me Articles |
Large dams may cause shifting regional weather extremes, causing scientists to wonder if aging dams around the world can withstand the extreme weather events they may inadvertently generate... So 45,000 large dams now amount to a global safety concern? Maybe we need an IPDS (International Panel on Dam Safety). Clearly the dams don't cause a change in the climate; rather the reservoirs of water that are created behind them could have an impact--which means Minnesota, land of 10,000 lakes, is probably screwed. While I suppose it's interesting from a scientific standpoint to determine whether or not small- to medium-size bodies of water can effect the local weather, this is hardly a global safety crisis. The article itself indicates that one potential solution is, believe it or not, to anticipate the rainfall and to make sure enough water is let out ahead of time. This has been done ever since dams were created. We need a study to tell us this? Of course... Hossain did note other factors could be responsible for this trend they have seen. "There is the question of whether or not this is all part of global warming instead of a local effect with dams," he noted. "That of course needs to be looked into more carefully." Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The scientist asks whether or not maybe what he's observing is actually just global warming and not dams. But why not look at it the other way around: Perhaps "global warming" isn't caused by CO2--maybe it's caused by the 45,000 dams we've built around the world. I guess we better get rid of all the dams in the world, just in case. Or maybe we can institute "cap and dam" where those countries that don't need their dams can sell them to those countries that do. Is anything not a crisis these days? Go to the article list |