Craig Steiner, u.s. Common Sense American Conservatism |
About Me & This Website My Positions On Facebook Contact Me Articles |
First, I'll recognize what the president did do right. Justice was served in what appears to have been a virtually flawless precision operation based on the culmination of nearly a decade of intelligence work. No Americans were injured. Pakistan was not informed which means Obama has learned that sometimes unilateral action is appropriate, even when another country's sovereignty must be violated. Obama, thankfully, continued--and maybe even built on--the work that President Bush began. He had the courtesy to give Bush a call before informing the nation. And President Obama did give the "go" order. I wish all of that had ended with a well-delivered, well-crafted speech to the nation to simply let America and the world know that justice had been done. And if he could have united Americans in the process, all the better. Unfortunately, once again, President Obama seems intent on never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity to just do and say the right thing and leave it at that. All About Obama As has become customary with this president, so much of the speech was about Obama rather than about the mission that was accomplished and those that accomplished it. Some examples: "I directed Leon Panetta to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority..." or "I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden..." or "I met repeatedly with my national security team as we developed more information" or "I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action" or "Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation" or "I've repeatedly made clear that we would take action" or "These efforts weigh on me every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one." To observe the difference one need only compare Obama's Bin Laden speech (or virtually any Obama speech) to FDR's Pearl Harbor Speech. Churchill's V-E Day speech. Truman's V-J Day speech. JFK's Cuban Missile Crisis Speech. George Bush at the outset of the first Gulf War. GWB's 9/11 speech. In none of those presidential speeches--nor any others that I can remember--were the president's words so centered on himself. The constant level of self-recognition by Obama is disturbing. In such a solemn, important, and historic moment it's more than a little bit unsettling that our president and/or his speechwriters would not recognize that it's not necessary for the president to pat himself on the back, take credit, or remind us he's commander-in-chief. It goes without saying. It's understood. It was was unbecoming for Obama to focus so many of his words on his own participation when there are so many that have risked and sacrificed so much more than he. Every sentence he uttered in which he highlighted his role diminished the weight and importance of what everyone else contributed. President Bush, on the other hand, issued a statement in which his only self-reference was him stating that he had congratulated Obama and the professionals responsible for the victory. Bush didn't dwell on, highlight, or even mention all the things he had done and the decisions he had made that ultimately led to this outcome. He didn't boast about his steadfastness in the mission. He simply congratulated everyone else involved. Classy. Confident. Presidential. Ignored President Bush Let's call a spade a spade: Bin Laden would most likely still be alive if it weren't for President Bush's persistence in the War on Terror in the face of withering criticism from the left, and even from then Senator Obama himself. I wouldn't expect Obama to recognize everything that he opposed that ultimately led to Sunday's success. But it would be appropriate to at least acknowledge President Bush's seven-year commitment to the mission under often brutal and hateful criticism. After so much of the speech being Obama talking about his participation, at least a hat tip to his predecessor would have been appropriate. I was waiting for it. It never came. When Americans landed on the moon, President Nixon had the class to refrain from a lengthy planned speech out of respect for the moon landing being the legacy of an earlier president, John F. Kennedy. It was entirely proper for Obama to say something about the outcome of the operation. But the only time Obama mentioned Bush was when he hid behind Bush's previous assertion that we aren't at war with Islam--as if he were afraid that people might think he was the first president to take that position. Emergency-Like Announcement While I'll admit this might come off as minutia, I'm honestly not sure the news had to be delivered by the president on a Sunday night at 10:30PM Eastern. I was enjoying a Sunday evening when all the sudden news started exploding that the president was going to address the nation on an unknown subject. I was immediately fearful about what might have happened, or what might be about to happen. This is the kind of thing that is usually related to national emergencies or matters of urgent national security... news of an attack on our country, news of us attacking another country, or a threat to our country. As time went on the scheduled time for Obama's address slipped, supposedly as he was notifying international leaders and Congressional leadership. My concern mounted. Then news started leaking that Osama had been found and killed. I was certainly pleased to hear that, but I immediately thought, "Ok, and what else is going on? Is there an imminent retaliatory threat?" Because even though America would certainly like to know about this, there must be something more to justify such a dramatic, hastily called late-night presidential address to the nation. There wasn't. By the time Obama took the podium we already knew the news. The only reason to watch the speech was to see if Obama was going to announce an imminent threat, or maybe some change in our defense posture or tactics. He didn't. In reality, President Obama caused a dramatic news frenzy so he could play the part of a glorified television anchorman. He wanted to report the news rather than someone else. This would have been fine if he taken the opportunity to say something that would have planted some seeds of unity. But he didn't. What Obama Should Have Said Here's what I think Obama should have said--it's the speech he gave on Sunday night with some small changes. By eliminating just seven sentences and making minor modifications to two more, Obama would have appeared far more presidential, less focused on himself, and made it more about America's success than "his" success. This slightly modified speech would have been very different and really could've set a different tone for our country. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children. That's it. Skeptics may say that the above changes are trivial. And perhaps they are. But they're the kind of "trivial" changes that make all the difference between a speech that invites all Americans to join in celebrating a national success a decade in the making and one that perpetuates decade-long divisions... by what was said and what was left unsaid. By highlighting his own participation while completely ignoring President Bush's contribution, he simultaneously appeared disturbingly narcissistic while maintaining the partisan divide that has so separated America on this very issue of our War on Terror. Instead of uniting America in a joint victory accomplished under both Presidents Bush and Obama, he attempted to make the victory his alone by failing to recognize his predecessor who initiated the mission. This, given his previous attacks on Bush's efforts and tactics, rings hollow and petty to half the country. Had Obama spoken a sentence or two in recognition of President Bush, his speech could have really moved the nation towards healing that decade-long division. And he would have earned an enormous amount of political capital that he'd be spending from now until November 2012. But he didn't. And, as a result, his speech became little more than another in a series of Obama-centric throw-away speeches. A year from now we'll all remember that Bin Laden was brought to justice but it's unlikely that we'll be looking back at Obama's words and how they bridged the partisan divide. Because they didn't. Obama often asks for bipartisanship and bemoans the fact that it doesn't exist, but he doesn't utilize nights like Sunday to say the words that would build bipartisanship. That would have been an investment that would have helped him (and America) "win the future." Which is why I say that Obama never seems to miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Generally speaking, I'm glad when Obama falls short. I don't want him to be effective at advancing his agenda because I don't agree with it. But there are moments like these when I hope beyond hope that Obama will rise to the occasion and simply say the words that could move mountains and unite this country, if only for awhile. I believe that most presidents get very few such opportunities. For Obama, this was one of those opportunities. And he missed it. Sunday was a good day for America. But it could've been so much better.
Go to the article list |